Thesis

Our core hypothesis grew out of a deep understanding of operational pain points. The fundamental concept was to create aircraft controllers governed by a beam of light, a laser beam, instead of traditional radio waves. As a UAV operator, I had personally felt this pain point very strongly. The financial impact of communication failures on organizations was, frankly, insane.

The key issue we experienced was communication interference. Modern radio beams are extremely wide, meaning the receiver on the aircraft listens broadly as well. This allows an adversary to sit far away with a jammer and still disrupt the aircraft. The result: communication failures and lost aircraft, creating enormous financial damage for organizations operating UAVs. And for many cases, it disrupts that mission.

We aimed to build aircraft controllers governed by a narrow laser beam. Since the beam would be pointed directly at the aircraft, it wouldn’t pick up interference from the sides, making communication interference basically disappear. This technology also promised superior stealth, as the UAV couldn’t be detected, jammed, or hijacked (beyond noise or visual detection). The combination of anti-jamming and stealth capabilities became the core promise of our technology, a potential replacement for today’s fragile RF systems.

Validation

Our initial target market, large UAVs, was quickly deemed physically and technologically infeasible. Based on early calculations, we realized the UAV route was irrelevant and pivoted to drones within just two weeks of starting the venture.

• Distance Degradation: The main technical challenge was the degradation of laser intensity as the beam traveled through the atmosphere, full of aerosols. The farther it went, the more its quality declined.
• Scalability Issues: While laser interception technologies have advanced, effective ranges remain relatively short (a few kilometers). Trying to solve this with multiple relays made the system fragile and entirely non-scalable.

Once we pivoted, we deepened our market understanding. We reached out to a wide range of relevant stakeholders: drone manufacturers, drone communication companies, the IDF Directorate of Defense Research & Development, and others. From the start, it was clear to us that we wouldn’t produce the drones themselves, but rather focus on the communication component.

During this initial outreach, we achieved our first technical milestone: developing a system that could transmit data via a laser beam and translate it into commands for the drone.

However, our new idea (after pivoting to drones) quickly ran into commercial walls. We realized that the additional amount drone operators were willing to pay to improve their systems wasn’t nearly enough for us to justify continuing.

During validation, we also spoke with several investor friends and had deep conversations with some of them. The feedback was consistent: while the pain was real, it wasn’t yet financial, and it wasn’t clear that customers would actually buy the solution.

Why it didn’t progress 

Despite strong validation from end-users that the communication interference was a “very significant pain point” and that the idea was “great”, the business model collapsed during the validation stage.

The reasons were fundamentally economic, shrinking the opportunity space too severely:

1. Unjustified Added Cost for Drones
The pivot to smaller drones revealed a key financial barrier:

• Low Willingness to Pay: We found that customers were only willing to increase drone costs by about 20%, even for a strong solution for the pain point we were trying to solve.
• High Component Cost: Laser components were not only expensive but also heavier, forcing the use of costlier drones.
• Value Mismatch: Communication failures in small drones cause minimal losses compared to large UAVs. The added value didn’t justify the added cost.
  

2. Market Size Contraction and Low Margins
These feasibility issues drastically reduced our Total Addressable Market (TAM):

• Small Market Use Cases: The TAM shrank by around 90%, as the solution became relevant only for very special operations or narrow markets.
• Low Industry Margins: Conversations with drone communication system manufacturers revealed that they operate on extremely low margins.
• Economic Non-Relevance: Combining a tiny TAM with thin margins made the business economically irrelevant. We estimated that, at best, it could generate only a few million shekels a year with tiny profit margins, not worth a decade of work. The low margins were the biggest surprise and ultimately led us to shut down the venture.
  

3. The Line-of-Sight Constraint
The inherent limitation of laser communication was too restrictive for broad use:

• Fragility: The system required direct line-of-sight. End-users asked valid questions, like what happens if the drone flies behind a building or into a forest?
• Limited Missions: This constraint limited the product to very specific missions. Moreover, it required complex and expensive gimbals to maintain directionality if operated by soldiers in the field.

We eventually concluded that the technology faced too many barriers and that we wouldn’t pursue this venture again.

Insights

1. Obsessive Customer and Price Mapping – Our biggest failure was realizing too late that we weren’t moving fast enough in market research.

• Map the B2B2B Cycle: We were operating in a B2B2B model with a complex sales cycle. We should have mapped it obsessively: identifying the real customer, the payer, and each stakeholder’s willingness to pay.
• Increase Velocity: Instead of two calls a week, we should have made twenty, to understand the sales cycle and pricing dynamics much earlier.

2. The Mindset of Searching for Flaws – Founders must learn to actively search for what’s wrong.

• Avoid Falling in Love: It’s critical not to fall in love with your idea. If something feels flawless, it probably means you haven’t challenged it hard enough. Actively look for both “why yes” and “why not.”.
• Hunt Competitors: Keep your “competitor radar” on at all times. Actively search for who else is working in the space and what they’re doing better or worse. The absence of competitors (as was the case for laser communications in Israel) is rarely a good sign.

3. The Role of Relationships and Self-Efficacy

• Leveraging DD: Personal relationships with industry experts were invaluable. They allowed us to reverse-engineer previous due diligence processes and quickly gain domain expertise.
• Self-Efficacy: Above all, self-efficacy was the most important element: balancing strong belief in ourselves with the discipline to remain highly critical of our idea.

4. Leverage AI!: Today, I can process 300 long reports in five minutes, something that used to take me days. AI has completely changed the game in how I approach research and validation.

---